Skip to content
Saturday, October 10, 2026
Modern Spark

The Worst Titles of the Year 2025, Per Aggregate Scores

Everywhere you look, fans are quick to share their rankings of the best titles of 2025. But what about the flops, the failures? It's time to take a momentary detour to examine the most panned games of the year, according to review aggregator Metacritic. Is every one of these games as disappointing as their scores suggest? Let's find out.

10. Welcome Tour for Switch 2

Metascore: 54/100, Audience Score: 3.4/10

Initial reactions to this tech demo were heavily influenced by its $9.99 price tag, with many feeling cheesed off it wasn't a free pack-in like similar console launches. Reviewer sentiment was quite mixed, from harsh disappointment to slightly kinder takes that noted the delightful software underneath the controversy. Regardless of the debate, the title proved to be a notable digital seller during its launch month.

9. Rennsport

Metascore: 53/100, User Score: 3.2/10

Presented as "not just a racing game," this driving sim from European developers was met with overwhelmingly poor reviews. Critics noted that the game was lacking in almost every category, especially in a year packed with high-quality racing titles. Ultimately, this sputtering stinker was advised to be left on the shelf.

8. The Purrfect Bubsy Collection

Aggregate Score: 53/100, User Score: 8.6/10

To begin with: the confusing title grammar is a silly annoyance. This compilation of SNES and PS1 platforming games revives a "attitude"-filled feline known for constant jokes. The consensus was that these games were not good originally and feel dated with age. The notably positive user score stands as a baffling anomaly to the professional reviews.

7. Hunter x Hunter Fighting Game

Metascore: 53, User Score: 3.5

This *Hunter x Hunter* fighter was met with harsh criticism from both professionals and players. Complaints centered on a small roster of characters and a severe lack of content. Fan reaction was particularly harsh, with some expressing a desire that the title's poor performance would be a warning for similar releases.

6. Riders Vs Dogoos

Metascore: 51, Audience Score: 5.3

Based on the niche Hyperdimension Neptunia series, this motorcycle action game tasks players with collecting cute monsters. Reviewers felt that its effort to channel a *Katamari Damacy*-like gameplay loop ultimately fell flat, coming across as more of a quick spin-off than a worthy addition to the franchise. Its short length combined with a $40 price tag was criticized.

5. Captain Blood

Aggregate Score: 50, User Score: 5.3

This title is a resurrected relic from the Xbox era, finally released after nearly two decades in legal limbo. The developers opted to keep the game as an period-accurate artifact of its time, fully aware that contemporary players might not appreciate its old-school mechanics. As such, many reviews concluded that the interesting history of its journey was more interesting than the game itself.

4. Scar-Lead

Metascore: 44, Audience Score: 2.4

This anime-art roguelike shooter modeled after games like *Returnal* failed to impress with critics. The main issues were repetitive adversaries, monotonous stage design, and a unengaging plot. A much-criticized system involving the outfit degradation was widely panned and took away from the game's potential charm.

3. Ambulance Life

Aggregate Score: 44, Audience Score: 4.9

Think of the tense surgery games of the past, then remove the satisfying gameplay. That, according to reviews, is pretty much *Ambulance Life*. Reviewers found the core gameplay loop to be a slog, and the narrative's handling of its subject matter was criticized as being insensitive. The overall experience was deemed a missed opportunity.

2. Tamagotchi Plaza

Aggregate Score: 43, Audience Score: 5.8

This new direction for the classic virtual pet formula turns the franchise into a shopping simulation title. The result, based on critics, was a dull series of basic activities that quickly grew tiresome. Some reviews went so far as to call it one of the lowest-quality titles available on its platform, citing a complete absence of satisfying gameplay.

1. MindsEye

Metascore: 37, Audience Score: 2.5

Positioned as a high-profile open-world action game from a team featuring experienced developers, *MindsEye* was a notable commercial failure. Reviews savaged its poor shooting mechanics, boring plot, and a host of horrendous bugs. Many found it to be a downgrade compared to previous-generation games in the action genre. Among the scathing reviews, a small handful of fans found something to enjoy in the experience, providing a distinct vote of confidence.

About the author

Bill Hatfield

Tech enthusiast and innovation strategist with over a decade of experience in digital transformation and emerging technologies.

Modern Spark

Type to search articles.