Skip to content
Saturday, October 10, 2026
Modern Spark

The Venezuelan Crisis Is Poised to Determine President Trump's Legacy - and the United States' Role in the Global Order

In the wake of executing a evening of overwhelming force in Venezuela, Donald Trump seems to be getting into the nation-building business.

In a notable media briefing at his Mar-a-Lago estate on Saturday morning, the commander-in-chief announced that US forces had successfully seized Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an overnight raid in Caracas.

Trump then said that a team comprising Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, collaborating with Venezuelans, would be seizing the reins of the beleaguered nation.

"We are going to manage the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition," he said.

What precisely "running the country" actually means is unclear, but the vow signifies an sudden shift in direction for the president, laden with contradictions and significant obstacles.

A leader who ran on opposing "forever wars", who sharply criticised past US efforts at overthrowing governments and who vowed to implement an "America first" foreign policy is now gambling his presidency on successfully rebuilding a South American nation whose economy is in shambles and whose governmental stability has been eroded by years of dictatorship.

Yet, Trump was unwaveringly confident.

He claimed his administration has a "perfect track record of winning" – and that this will be no different. He promised to recruit American oil firms to repair Venezuela's crumbling industrial infrastructure, supplying capital for the American reconstruction efforts and benefitting the Venezuelan people.

He did not exclude sending American soldiers to Venezuela to further these efforts. "We do not fear boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he told reporters.

Trump, a vocal opponent of the US intervention of Iraq, will now have to remember the words of one of the American planners of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you shatter it, you are responsible for it."

An Altered International Stance

The US has redefined Venezuela's destiny – whether for good or ill.

Trump entered office nearly a year ago pledging to be a peacemaker, but over the past year he has proven that he is quite prepared to use armed force internationally.

In the past week, he authorized airstrikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he struck atomic sites in Iran, suspected narco-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, rebel forces in Yemen, militias in Somalia and Islamic militants in Iraq.

In contrast to previous operations, which have mostly involved missiles and warplanes that reduce the exposure of American forces to harm, Trump's Venezuela operation – and his commitments to the future of that nation – are notably different.

His aim, he said during his briefing, is to "make Venezuela great again."

Response at Home and Abroad

That variation of Trump's "MAGA" – or Maga - mantra could be hard for some of Trump's backers to accept.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump ally who broke with the president after charging him of deserting his core supporters, was swift to denounce the president's actions on social media.

"Public outrage with our own government's never ending military aggression and support of foreign wars is justified because we are forced to fund it," she wrote. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another notable Trump detractor, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, compared the legal justification for Maduro's arrest – on arms and drug trafficking charges – with Trump's explanation that the operation was to retake confiscated US oil and stop fentanyl production.

Most Republican lawmakers rallied behind the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson describing the military action against a "illegitimate government" as "decisive and warranted".

Policy Rationales and Worldwide Consequences

During his appearance, the president said the Venezuelan operation furthered his "America First" agenda because it guaranteed US hemispheric security and provided a reliable source of oil.

He resurrected the Monroe Doctrine – an nineteenth-century American diplomatic policy that declared the Western Hemisphere should be free from influence by European powers – and renamed it the "Donroe Doctrine."

The move in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "American dominance in the Western Hemisphere will not be questioned again."

The purpose of the new US security policy, he said, was to "safeguard commerce, land and assets that are central to our national security." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "backyard."

Trump's decision to apprehend Maduro will raise broader questions in global politics, however, and impact American ties with the world's other major military powers.

The Chinese foreign ministry released a statement voicing shock and condemning what it said was a reckless assault on a independent country.

During the previous administration, the US offered similar censures of Russia following its incursion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is trying to broker a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has often appeared to be more favourable to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a centrist Republican congressman, expressed worry about the message Trump's actions might send.

"My primary worry is now Russia will use this to excuse their illegal and brutal operations against Ukraine, or China to rationalize an invasion of Taiwan."

Opposition and Legal Scrutiny

Trump's Democratic opponents were blunter.

"The United States should not be running other countries for any purpose," said a senator who serves on the Foreign Relations Committee. "We should have understood by now not to get entangled in perpetual conflicts and regime change missions that carry catastrophic results for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a criminal and a dictator with a record of rights violations. But he condemned Trump's decision not to consult with congressional leaders prior to initiating the attack.

"The President has the legal duty to abide by the law and protect institutional norms in the United States," he said. "That is what putting America First demands."

Trump, in his remarks, said that he opted not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "disclose" particulars of the operation before the attack.

An Uncertain Future

That mission was a triumph – with no American deaths and minimal harm to US assets. Trump, with his typical confidence, described the operation as a "daring raid" and "among the most astonishing, effective and powerful demonstrations of American military might and competency in US history."

Now he is staking his legacy on that success continuing, as the US claims it will take over administering and reconstructing Venezuela - though what that actually means is unknown. He and his team must rebuild a nation that has been in turmoil for decades while calming a region that is sure to be wary of what Trump's foreign policy has in store for them.

About the author

Bill Hatfield

Tech enthusiast and innovation strategist with over a decade of experience in digital transformation and emerging technologies.

Modern Spark

Type to search articles.